Uncovered: Rasia v. Armenia tribunal finds that contractual claims are time-barred and sees no BIT breach on the merits; umbrella clause requires contractual privity, while tribunal finds that non-monetary expenditures satisfy contribution requirement

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.