Looking Back: On the merits, tribunal in Tza Yap Shum v. Peru found that interim seizure of company’s assets by tax authorities constituted an indirect expropriation in violation of the China-Peru BIT; impact on investment and arbitrariness excluded application of police powers doctrine

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.