Looking Back: Azurix v. Argentina tribunal grappled with the distinction between contractual and treaty claims, discussed legitimate expectations, and found that the state’s behaviour towards a water concessionaire amounted to a treaty violation

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.