Analysis: In B-Mex v. Mexico dissent, Raul Vinuesa would have declined jurisdiction over more than two dozen claimants who were not identified in initial NAFTA Notice of Intent

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.