Analysis: Tribunal majority finds that China’s investment treaty with Singapore limits investment arbitration to disputes over the amount of compensation for expropriation; dissenter considers that BIT was not properly interpreted

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

AsiaPhos v. China tribunal issues its award, with a tribunal majority seeing no scope to rule on existence of expropriation under arbitration clause limited to disputes involving the amount of compensation for expropriation

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.