Archives

Analysis: ICSID tribunal rejects Colombia’s request for security for costs, seeing no risk of non-compliance due to assignment of claims to new entity

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Uncovered: Littop v. Ukraine ECT tribunal recognizes “unclean hands” principle and declines jurisdiction over 6 billion USD case after finding that the investment was tainted by corruption; denial of benefits objection is also upheld

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Analysis: Majority in Interocean v. Nigeria uphold jurisdiction under Nigeria’s investment law, while dissenter finds that the claimants were never properly registered; however, the investors’ local partner’s actions cannot be attributed to Nigeria

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Analysis: a full run-down of the Svea Court of Appeal’s reasoning in the recent PL Holdings v. Poland set-aside decision

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Breaking: Svea Court of Appeal upholds (most of) intra-EU award against Poland, finding that state’s Achmea-related objections are time-barred

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

In unusual twist, arbitrators order Nigerian state to disclose how it has bankrolled defence of investment arbitration – and then refuses to order security for costs due to state being immunized from incurring costs

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.