Analysis: In Rios v. Chile, arbitrators disagree over limitation period for continuing breaches; “unequivocal and reasonable expectations”, sovereign acts, and substantial deprivation are at the centre of the tribunal’s expropriation analysis

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.