Analysis: In APMCA v. USA, arbitrators find that bifurcating proceedings to hear respondent’s arguments regarding ratione temporis scope of NAFTA/USMCA transition provisions and ratione materiae objections best serves procedural fairness and efficiency
Aug 13, 2024 |
You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.