Analysis: Ballantine v. DR award surfaces, revealing how arbitrators dealt with – and disagreed over – first case to engage CAFTA’s ‘dominant and effective nationality’ requirement; third-party funding also reared its head at hearings

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.