World Wide Minerals (WWM) v. Kazakhstan (2)

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2013

Case Status: Arbitral Phase Concluded

Claimant(s): World Wide Minerals (WWM)

Respondent(s): Republic of Kazakhstan

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Canada-Russia BIT

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Analysis: Final award in WWM v. Kazakhstan is partially set aside, as UK judge finds that the tribunal’s reasoning on causation and quantum was not debated by the parties Nov 24, 2020

UK court agrees to enforce Tatneft v. Ukraine award, while quantum findings in WWM v. Kazakhstan are set aside Nov 23, 2020

Canadian investor World Wide Minerals secures $40 mil BIT award in decades-long fight over Kazakhstan uranium investment Oct 31, 2019

In a dramatic holding, UNCITRAL tribunal finds that Kazakhstan is bound by terms of former USSR BIT with Canada Jan 28, 2016

Central Asia Round-up: Updates on claims against Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Oct 15, 2014

After failure of claim under Kazakh statute, Canadian miner hopes that USSR-Canada investment treaty permits arbitration with Kazakhstan Dec 18, 2013