1. Home
  2. Arbitration Cases
  3. Seventhsun and others v. Poland

Seventhsun and others v. Poland

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2012

Claimant(s): Seventhsun and others

Respondent(s): Republic of Poland

Arbitral Rules: SCC

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Cyprus-Poland BIT

Administrative Case Number: SCC 138/2012

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Prior IAReporter Coverage of Seventhsun and others v. Poland

Poland round-up (part three): after dismissing all claims, arbitrators set out reasons as to why claimants should bear 90% of legal and arbitral costs Jul 25, 2017
Sekolec-chaired tribunal sees no investment treaty breach in relation to seizure of investor shares during criminal proceedings Aug 2, 2016
Poland claims round-up: at least a dozen investment treaty arbitrations Jul 29, 2015
Eastern Europe round-up: One Polish case ends at ICSID, while another proceeds at SCC; Slovakia denies benefits of U.S. BIT to would-be claimant Oct 28, 2014
Poland update: government grappling with at least five treaty disputes; arbitrators rule on participation of counsel in ICSID case Aug 9, 2013