1. Home
  2. Arbitration Cases
  3. Samsung Engineering v. Saudi Arabia

Samsung Engineering v. Saudi Arabia

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2017

Claimant(s): Samsung v. Saudi Arabia

Respondent(s): Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Arbitral Rules: ICSID

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: South Korea-Saudia Arabia BIT

Administrative Case Number: ARB/17/43

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Prior IAReporter Coverage of Samsung Engineering v. Saudi Arabia

After Saudi Arabia fails to dislodge arbitrator, government moves to disqualify opposing counsel in BIT case – leading to a new ruling Aug 8, 2018
Saudi Arabia’s challenge to Stanimir Alexandrov is rejected Apr 30, 2018
Arbitrator challenges: Bernard Hanotiau survives challenge in pending BIT arbitration; Saudi Arabia lodges challenge to Stanimir Alexandrov Mar 19, 2018
Saudi Arabia faces a second BIT claim within days, as Korean investor turns to arbitration Nov 13, 2017