RECOFI v. Vietnam

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2013

Case Status: Set Aside Concluded

Claimant(s): RECOFI

Respondent(s): Socialist Republic of Vietnam

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: France-Vietnam BIT

Administrative Case Number: PCA Case No. 2014-14

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Annulment/Set-Aside Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Frustrated by inability to collect on costs orders against foreign investors, Vietnam pushes for stricter “security for costs” provisions in investment treaties Oct 27, 2018

Local court affirms UNCITRAL tribunal’s dismissal of Vietnamese BIT claim centered on unpaid invoices for cross-border sales by Recofi SA Oct 13, 2016

INVESTIGATION: Vietnam prevails in UNCITRAL BIT arbitration with (another) French investor May 29, 2016

UNCITRAL Arbitrations Update (Vietnam and Canada): Appointing authorities pick chairs in a pair of investment treaty claims Apr 9, 2014

As Vietnam explores collection of costs award against unsuccessful investor, another claimant sticks its head above the parapet Feb 14, 2014