OJSC “Tatneft” v. Ukraine

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2008

Case Status: Set Aside Concluded

Claimant(s): OJSC “Tatneft”

Respondent(s): Ukraine

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Russia-Ukraine BIT

Administrative Case Number: PCA Case No. 2008-08

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

US Court weighs in on arbitrator impartiality and corporate restructuring Aug 25, 2020

Previously-unseen jurisdictional award waves away objections to Russian-owned investment claim in Tatneft v. Ukraine Apr 19, 2017

In long-confidential Russia-Ukraine BIT award, tribunal reviews evidence of alleged “black raid” by oligarch, facilitated by Ukraine’s courts and Prosecutor Apr 7, 2017

In Tatneft v Ukraine award, tribunal sees breach of FET in the totality of the record but awards only the price originally paid by the investor Apr 7, 2017

UPDATED: Paris Court of Appeal weighs in on Russia-Ukraine BIT awards Nov 30, 2016

Ukraine: updates on arbitrator resignations, costs-order collections, and other recent arbitral developments Oct 8, 2015

After $112 million arbitration loss to Russian oil company, Ukraine looks to set-aside award Aug 27, 2014