Nissan v. India

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2017

Claimant(s): Nissan

Respondent(s): Republic of India

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: India-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement

Administrative Case Number: PCA Case No. 2017-37

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Nissan v. India: Previously-unseen jurisdictional decision reveals tribunal’s rejection of objections on tribunal constitution, fork-in-the-road, contractual forum selection clause, time-bar, and taxation exception Sep 13, 2019

India round-up: BIT claims withdrawn on cusp of hearings; another dispute is formally notified; and Japanese investor reportedly clears jurisdictional hurdles May 29, 2019

An update on investment treaty disputes involving the Government of India Aug 23, 2018

India round-up: updates on five pending investment treaty arbitrations, including rulings (on liability in Deutsche Telekom case), tribunals and anti-suit injunctions Mar 21, 2018

Indian state government seeks domestic court order to restrain Nissan’s BIT arbitration, as claimant seeks interim measures to restrain India Dec 20, 2017

Another treaty claim against India surfaces Dec 1, 2017