JSC Tashkent Mechanical Plant v. Kyrgyzstan

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2016

Case Status: Arbitral Phase Pending

Claimant(s): JSC Tashkent Mechanical Plant, JSCB Asaka, JSCB Uzbek Industrial and Construction Bank, National Bank for Foreign and Economic Actvity

Respondent(s): Kyrgyz Republic

Arbitral Rules: ICSID AF

Legal Instrument: Domestic Law, Treaty

Treaty: Kyrgyzstan investment law

Administrative Case Number: ARB(AF)/16/4

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

CIS Round-Up: An update on new developments in the region Aug 7, 2020

CIS Round-up: An update on arbitration cases against Armenia, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan Jun 17, 2020

ICSID tribunal dismisses Kyrgyzstan’s preliminary jurisdictional objections in Uzbek case May 7, 2019

Kyrgyzstan round-up: new tribunals, new disputes, and updates on multiple longer-running matters Apr 30, 2019

Kyrgyzstan arbitration round-up: updates on JSC Tashkent, Centerra and Stans Energy cases Feb 16, 2017

Briefly noted: Uzbeks lodge bilateral investment treaty claim at ICSID against Kyrgyzstan Sep 14, 2016