Isolux Infrastructure v. Spain

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2013

Case Status: Arbitral Phase Concluded

Claimant(s): Isolux Infrastructure Netherlands B.V.

Respondent(s): Kingdom of Spain

Arbitral Rules: SCC

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Energy Charter Treaty

Administrative Case Number: SCC Case No. 153/2013

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

In newly-unearthed Energy Charter Treaty award (Isolux v. Spain), arbitrators grapple with denial of benefits, nationality planning, tax carve-out and EU law issues Jun 29, 2017

In now-public Isolux v. Spain award, measures that later breached investor protections in Eiser case were not deemed to breach Isolux’s legitimate expectations Jun 29, 2017

ANALYSIS: where do matters stand with respect to Energy Charter Treaty claims against Spain? Sep 28, 2016

A second arbitral tribunal at Stockholm weighs in with an ECT verdict in a Spanish renewables dispute Jul 13, 2016

Spain solar claims update: jurisdictional ruling comes down in an ICSID case, as a pair of awards loom – and two more ECT arbitrations get under way Jul 4, 2016

Tribunals finalized in UNCITRAL and SCC claims arising out of solar-power controversies Apr 17, 2014