1. Home
  2. Arbitration Cases
  3. International Thunderbird v. Mexico

International Thunderbird v. Mexico

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2002

Claimant(s): International Thunderbird Corporation

Respondent(s): United Mexican States

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: NAFTA

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Prior IAReporter Coverage of International Thunderbird v. Mexico

Looking Back (1 of 2): In Thunderbird v. Mexico, majority recognizes the concept of legitimate expectations, but finds that government shut-down of gambling activities did not violate NAFTA Oct 30, 2018
Looking Back (2 of 2): In Thunderbird v. Mexico separate opinion, Thomas Wälde ties legitimate expectations to FET standard, disagrees with majority on violation of legitimate expectations, and rejects “loser pays” approach Oct 30, 2018
ANALYSIS: Gov’ts have no success in forcing claimants to post security while treaty arbitrations are ongoing Feb 10, 2009
ANALYSIS: Rare for investors to pay state’s defence costs, despite recent rulings in Plama v. Bulgaria and U.S. arbitrations Sep 17, 2008