1. Home
  2. Arbitration Cases
  3. Grand River Enterprises Six Nations v. USA

Grand River Enterprises Six Nations v. USA

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2004

Claimant(s): Grand River Enterprises Six Nations Ltd, Jerry Montour, Kenneth Hill and Arthur Montour

Respondent(s): United States of America

Arbitral Rules: UNCITRAL and/or Ad-Hoc

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: NAFTA

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Prior IAReporter Coverage of Grand River Enterprises Six Nations v. USA

Arbitrators in NAFTA arbitration reject all claims against United States in tobacco industry dispute Mar 6, 2011
ANALYSIS: Tribunal in Grand River v. U.S.A. arbitration declines to import non-investment law obligations into NAFTA; role of other “relevant” legal obligations in treaty interpretation under Vienna Convention is not discussed Mar 6, 2011
Canadian indigenous association writes to tribunal in support of claimants in NAFTA tobacco arbitration Feb 28, 2009
ANALYSIS: human rights law arguments figure prominently in NAFTA dispute over indigenous tobacco enterprise Feb 10, 2009
Briefs exchanged in Grand River Enterprises, et.al. v. USA; NAFTA Chapter 11 arbitration arises out of tobacco dispute Feb 10, 2009