Eco Oro Minerals v. Colombia

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2016

Claimant(s): Eco Oro Minerals Corp

Respondent(s): Republic of Colombia

Arbitral Rules: ICSID

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Canada-Colombia FTA

Administrative Case Number: ARB/16/41

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

In new ruling, ICSID tribunal denies application for non-disputing party submission, considering that the petitioners failed to prove that the arbitral dispute involved issues of human rights Feb 20, 2019

Arbitrators reject Colombia’s bid to have certain objections heard at outset of key mining case (Eco Oro) Aug 27, 2018

Colombia round-up: new developments in treaty-based investment arbitrations Jun 17, 2018

Warring parties come to agreement on sharing of any future proceeds of investment treaty claim against Colombia Aug 3, 2017

As struggling miner pursues outside finance for arbitration against Colombia, dissident shareholders object to percentage of potential recovery that would accrue to funders Apr 5, 2017

Colombia update: Canadian miner Eco Oro proceeds to arbitration; dispute with Novartis is at consultation phase, with no arbitration afoot as yet Dec 9, 2016

Two new treaty-based disputes center on friction between Colombian mining and national parks – and highlight differing transparency rules in Canadian and U.S. FTAs Mar 9, 2016