1. Home
  2. Arbitration Cases
  3. Ampal-American Israel Corporation and others v. Egypt

Ampal-American Israel Corporation and others v. Egypt

You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to view additional case details. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.

Case Details

Year of Filing: 2012

Case Status: Arbitral Phase Concluded

Claimant(s): Ampal-American Israel Corporation and others

Respondent(s): Arab Republic of Egypt

Arbitral Rules: ICSID

Legal Instrument: Treaty

Treaty: Egypt-Germany BIT, Egypt-USA BIT

Administrative Case Number: ARB/12/11

Arbitral Tribunal

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

You are not logged in.

Major Developments

Key Decision:

You are not logged in.

Counsel

Counsel for Claimant:

You are not logged in.

Counsel for Respondent:

You are not logged in.

Prior IAReporter Coverage of Ampal-American Israel Corporation and others v. Egypt

In a rare development, Egypt is facing BIT claims before local courts Jul 21, 2020
Two cases are discontinued at ICSID following the parties’ settlements May 29, 2020
Egypt Round-up: an update on new investment claims, settlements, and arbitrator appointments Nov 30, 2018
ICSID tribunals hearing separate Egyptian gas cases adopt diverging holdings on attribution question and on BIT-compatibility of revocation of tax-free status Oct 22, 2018
Egypt round-up: a new investment treaty claim by Future Pipe International B.V. lands at ICSID, as at least seven other arbitrations moved forward Aug 27, 2017
Overview: what’s happening in Egypt-Israel gas pipeline arbitrations May 2, 2017
In new Egypt ruling, disproportionate contract termination and failure to prevent pipeline attacks underpin Fortier-chaired tribunal’s findings of BIT breach Feb 28, 2017
Arbitrators allow investor to cure a “crystalised” abuse of process by choosing to drop one of two sets of parallel BIT arbitration claims May 29, 2016
ANALYSIS: BIT tribunal lays out investor-friendly reading of U.S. investment treaty’s denial of benefits provision; sees no scope for retrospective effect May 29, 2016
Fernandez-Armesto-chaired ICC tribunal finds $2 billion damages in Egyptian gas case, with other claims – including treaty cases – still pending Dec 7, 2015
Repeat appointments by claimant’s law firm were at center of (rejected) challenge to arbitrator in Venezuela case, but less central in Repsol v. Argentina case Oct 17, 2013
Battle is joined on second treaty-arbitration front in Israel-Egypt gas fight, as ad-hoc arbitral tribunal is chosen Feb 6, 2013
UPDATED: ICSID tribunals constituted in gas, mining and electricity cases against Indonesia, Slovakia, Egypt and Peru Oct 22, 2012