Looking Back: In AMT v. Zaire, arbitrators differ as to relevance of BIT provision for non-combat losses at hands of armed forces; damages valuation is opaque
Jan 18, 2017 |
You are not logged in. If you are a subscriber, please Login to access. If you are not a subscriber, you can contact us for a rate quote at subscribe@iareporter.com. Alternatively, you can sign up to receive free email headlines here.